<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uzbekistan: Unwanted Changes</title>
	<link>http://www.neweurasia.net/2008/05/12/uzbekistan-unwanted-changes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  4 Jul 2008 04:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ataman Rakin</title>
		<link>http://www.neweurasia.net/2008/05/12/uzbekistan-unwanted-changes/#comment-97041</link>
		<dc:creator>Ataman Rakin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neweurasia.net/2008/05/12/uzbekistan-unwanted-changes/#comment-97041</guid>
		<description>I am rather in favor of Latinisation. Why? If the Uzbek and other Turkic languages in the region are to keep some sort of position in today's world or even in Eurasia, it will have to join up in a wider language sphere with a leading language and that is obviously Turkish. 

Besides ca. 70 million speakers, Turkish already has a Latin alphabet adapted to Turkic sounds (ç, ş, ı, ğ, c, … ), and adapted IT and printing technology. 

The Latinisation process has taken quite well in Azerbaijan and (seems so) Turkmenistan. But the way it was done in Uzbekistan (with sound letters or letter combinations copied straight from English) is clumsy and neither fish nor fowl. 

The same reasoning applies, IMO, for Tajik which is not really a language but sovietised, castrated Farsi. If it is to keep some position it will have to join up in a wider Farsi sphere and that means re-adopting the Farsi-Arabic alphabet.

BTW, the whole Uzbek national identity that the regime constructed after the USSR (Özbekçilik, the Timur cult, ... ) is a completely artificial, neo-Soviet (in fact Lenin is merely remplaced by Timur) concept that holds little ground among the people. 

Indeed if you go deeper into Uzbek or ohter Central Asian identities then you see basically two elements that come up: the Soviet-colonial experience, and Islam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am rather in favor of Latinisation. Why? If the Uzbek and other Turkic languages in the region are to keep some sort of position in today&#8217;s world or even in Eurasia, it will have to join up in a wider language sphere with a leading language and that is obviously Turkish. </p>
<p>Besides ca. 70 million speakers, Turkish already has a Latin alphabet adapted to Turkic sounds (ç, ş, ı, ğ, c, … ), and adapted IT and printing technology. </p>
<p>The Latinisation process has taken quite well in Azerbaijan and (seems so) Turkmenistan. But the way it was done in Uzbekistan (with sound letters or letter combinations copied straight from English) is clumsy and neither fish nor fowl. </p>
<p>The same reasoning applies, IMO, for Tajik which is not really a language but sovietised, castrated Farsi. If it is to keep some position it will have to join up in a wider Farsi sphere and that means re-adopting the Farsi-Arabic alphabet.</p>
<p>BTW, the whole Uzbek national identity that the regime constructed after the USSR (Özbekçilik, the Timur cult, &#8230; ) is a completely artificial, neo-Soviet (in fact Lenin is merely remplaced by Timur) concept that holds little ground among the people. </p>
<p>Indeed if you go deeper into Uzbek or ohter Central Asian identities then you see basically two elements that come up: the Soviet-colonial experience, and Islam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online &#187; Uzbekistan: Unwanted Changes</title>
		<link>http://www.neweurasia.net/2008/05/12/uzbekistan-unwanted-changes/#comment-95770</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online &#187; Uzbekistan: Unwanted Changes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 07:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neweurasia.net/2008/05/12/uzbekistan-unwanted-changes/#comment-95770</guid>
		<description>[...] posted on neweurasia.    Posted by Tolkun   Share [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] posted on neweurasia.    Posted by Tolkun   Share [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
