Kazakhstan

Kyrgyzstan

Tajikistan

Turkmenistan

Uzbekistan

Home » Business and Economics, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan

Full steam ahead to Roghunarok?

Written by on Monday, 29 March 2010
Business and Economics, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan
5 Comments
Are Tajikistan and Uzbekistan slowly spiralling toward serious conflict over the Roghun project?  Image by Flickr user vitroid (CC-usage).

Are Tajikistan and Uzbekistan slowly spiralling toward serious conflict over the Roghun project? Image by Flickr user vitroid (CC-usage).

Editor’s note: Tajik and Uzbek officials traded barbs during this weekend’s security conference in Dushanbe. The argument concerned freight train shipments for Tajikistan that have been stalled on Uzbek territory, but as neweurasia’s Dushanbe explains, the real reason is the Roghun dam project. Are the two countries steaming toward conflict? Their disagreement is now involving major players, including the United States, which may raise the stakes, but also point the way toward peaceful resolution.

This past Saturday during a regional security conference in Dushanbe, Uzbekistan’s ambassador to Tajikistan, Shahqasim Shahislomov, confirmed that about 1000 railway carriages transporting goods to Tajikistan have been halted in the Uzbek territory.  He explained that the problem was caused by logistical issues related to shipments of supplies destined for U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan:

There are goods destined for Europe, Russia, Kazakhstan and other destinations; no one specifically chosen the Tajik carriages to stop.

The chairman of Tajikistan’s National Security Council, Amirqul Azimov, disagreed.   He told the same conference that each of the railway carriages has its own documentation and specifically all of the Tajik freight traffic are being blocked at the Uzbek-Tajik border, far from the Uzbek-Afghan border.

We perfectly know where and how many carriages were detained, but when you say you do not know if the carriages belongs to Russians, Americans or Kazakhs, and that the problem is purely technical, we say every carriage has own papers.

Furthermore, Azimov said that some of the carriages have been detained in Uzbek territory since early February.  Several Tajik newspapers are saying that the blocked carriages contain machinery and cement important to the controversial Roghun project, the construction of which has increased tensions between the countries.

Roghunarok approaching?

This controversy between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan over the Roghun project is now taking on a new international twist since it is somehow touching the Americans’ Northern Distribution Network, a new road to supply NATO forces in Afghanistan.  This network is intended as an alternative to the Pakistan supply routes that have been routinely targeted and damaged by Taleban. This past Friday, the Associated Press described the dispute between the two countries as causing a “bottleneck“.

Tajikistan’s Prime Minister, Aqil Aqilov, has appealed to United Nations Secretary General to help settle the dispute. He harshly criticizes Uzbekistan, accusing it of creating an economic blockade against Tajikistan.  Uzbekistan’s President Islam Karimov is fighting back.  He recently won the support of Kazakhstan against the Roghun project during Nursultan Nazarbayev’s recent visit. Nazarbayev said that the construction should be halted until possible ecological damage can be internationally assessed.

Meanwhile, the head of the Organization of Collective Security (ODKB), Nikolai Bordyuzha, witnessed the spat between Shahislomov and Azimov.  He remarked that there should be no serious conflicts between members of the alliance, which includes Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan.  I hope his remark bodes well for the prospects of peace between Tajikistan and Uzebkistan, as these countries will find a diplomatic compromise.

Bookmark and Share

5 Comments »

  • [...] concerned freight train shipments for Tajikistan that have been stalled on Uzbek territory, but as neweurasia’s Dushanbe explains, the real reason is the Roghun dam project. Cancel this [...]

  • Zokir says:

    I think Uzbekistan’s position on the Roghun is a correct one. There should be some levers as to how Tajikistan uses water. Tajikistan assures that after the completing of the dum construction, it will fill the Reservoir in 14 years, thus it will not affect the levels of water going downstream. But how can one trust their promises, and not think that Emomali with his clientile government, or the Tajik public which invested in the construction of the dum will want to see their dividents coming earlier, i.e. letting less water go downstream. It was one of the reasons why Uzbeks suggested to have a share in the control of the whole thing. Thank God, at least, Tajiks were wise enough not to let Russian firms into the construction of the dum, because their demand was a total control of Roghun water levels by Russians. This would be a good whip for Uzbekistan, every time it would look westwards, Russia would punish by cutting water.
    I really wish Tajiks can make some good compromise and assure that they will not steal too much water from Uzbeks. Unfortunately, the experience with Zarafshan river control by Tajik authorities which deprived Samarkand, Bukhara and Navai of much of the irrigation water, indicates that Roghun will be a killer of Uzbek farmers.

    Reply

  • Turgun says:

    Tajiks should definitely start requesting an international Environmental Impact Assessment of the Uzbek cotton growing practices:

    Uzbekistan reportedly makes about US$1 000 000 000 generated by cotton industry annually.

    The latter accounts to about three dollars per month per capita for Uzbeks. That is a small amount, and Uzbeks spend more on the mobile phones every month. Moreover, if one considers all the ignored environmental externalities, then even this funny amount will become not only a smaller but actually a NEGATIVE value.

    Uzbekistan causes too many externalities for the region and itself:
    Aral Sea problem (salt from dried seabed pollutes and melts not only Tian-Shan ice but could probably be traced in the Polar regions as well), child labor, water intensiveness, corruption, you name it.

    Reply

  • [...] the best thing the government can do with all the extra currency is to trade it.  However, due to an ongoing railroad blockade by Uzbekistan, trade activity is down by 35%.  A 100 somoni share bought in January is now worth 94 somoni, so [...]

  • [...] of Tajikistan, good luck. The embassy criticized the Tajik mass media for its reports about the captive railway carriages in Uzbekistan as “lies and baseless allegations.” They went on to say, “The [...]

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.