Kazakhstan

Kyrgyzstan

Tajikistan

Turkmenistan

Uzbekistan

Home » Cross-regional and Blogosphere, Culture and History

Another conspiracy theory

From Flickr's Creative Commons [http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevenbaker/101745856/]

From Flickr's Creative Commons [http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevenbaker/101745856/

Let’s agree that Central Asia is sometimes behind the rest of the world.  This is not due to decline or inability, but distance and difficulties in translation.  For example, when the Internet was first speeding up and going broadband, no one was really expecting it to hit Central Asia before the year 2005.  Similarly speaking, I’m afraid that technology and internet memes are not the only things to hit Central Asia slowly.

While living in Kazakhstan and elsewhere in Central Asia, I heard many conspiracy theories.  One assumes most theories serve a purpose – to easily explain something away, leaving a smoking gun in the hand of the people you trust/like the least.  I recently heard one that made my blood boil.  I should say it made my blood boil again, as it is something I have been discounting to my Arab and other Muslim friends literally since the autumn of 2001.  Let me be the first person writing under the name Timur to try and put this straight.  The ridiculous rumor goes something like this.

On the morning of September 11th, about 4000 Jews did not show up for work at the World Trade Center.  This number is supposed to imply that either no Jewish people died in the attacks, or that at least a disproportionate number were warned by Mossad. What’s more, the Israelis had some diabolical part to play in the overall conspiracy, whose primary goal was to implicate the Muslims of the Middle East, and help jump start the second Iraq War, whilst, and at the same time, diverting Western attention from the thieving murdering actions of Jews in Israel.

I think Islamic Fundamentalism is an import into Central Asia, not something fundamentally homegrown, and this imported conspiracy theory is one damning piece of evidence.  What the hell do Turkic Hanafi Muslims in Central Asia care about the problems of Arab Nationalism, the Ba’ath Party, and the anti-Zionist movements?  Need someone remind the Central Asians that the Ba’ath Party isn’t exactly arranging slumber parties and sock-hops for the Turkmen, Kurds, and other non-Arabs already in the Middle East?

So, with the help of Snopes.com, here is a blow-by-blow to this ridiculous conspiracy.  I know that it really doesn’t matter how many times I explain this version of events, because if you want to believe Jews are evil, conspiratorial, wily, [insert adjective here] no-good-niks, this blog post isn’t going to get in your way.  But at least I have the US Government on my side.

September 11, 2001

2,976 victims and 19 hijackers die in massive terrorist attack articulated in New York City and at the Pentagon.

September 12, 2001

The daily edition of the Jerusalem Post reported:

The Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem has so far received the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the areas of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon at the time of the attacks.

September 17, 2001

Lebanese Hezbollah-owned satellite television channel Al-Manar reports that 4,000 Jewish people called in sick on September 11th.

And that’s it.  There you have it.  That’s where the mythical number came from, that’s the short time line between tragedy and propaganda.  From there, the story was grabbed and spun, eventually making it to Pravda, not as news, but as hearsay to show the historically anti-Semitic Russian public that there were alternate stories to 9/11.  I doubt many people would take Pravda at face value, but there’s something to be said for the lie told a thousand times eventually being mistaken for the truth.  Have you heard the one where the Jews are responsible for the Sphinx’s missing nose?  I’ll save that one for another day.  I’ll let Snopes have the last word.

Why would Israel follow such a course of action, betray its staunchest ally, and doom thousands of innocent Americans to death?  There are no rational answers to that question, only ugly progandistic ones.  “Israel wants to draw American into a final showdown with its Arab enemies, so they didn’t warn us” – the same conspiracy theory that posited our leaders knew about the impending Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and allowed it to happen in order to galvanize public support for a war.  Old theory, new clothes.  Even darker is the implication that Israel, not content to wait for an attack which would embroil America in a Middle Eastern war, forced the issue by pulling off a monstrous act of terrorism against the USA themselves.

Bookmark and Share

3 Comments »

  • Turgai Sangar says:

    “I think Islamic Fundamentalism is an import into Central Asia (…) What the hell do Turkic Hanafi Muslims in Central Asia care about the problems of Arab Nationalism, the Ba’ath Party, and the anti-Zionist movements? (…)”

    Timur, why do you almost automatically equalize Ba’athist Nationalism and so-called ‘Islamic Fundamentalism’?

    For the rest, why should Eurasian Hanafi Turks care? Well, maybe because the Western (and Israëli) support for criminal regimes like that in e.g. Uzbekistan is part of the very same strategy and agenda to subjugate ‘the Islamic world’ than the support given to Israëls policy towards the Palestinians for instance.

    http://qirim-vilayeti.com/content/view/1283/97/

    Reply

    Turgai Sangar Reply:

    “Of course, as far as the Baath tradition is concerned, the existence of a strong inspiration by European Fascist thought is not in doubt. It was explicit in the original Baathist ideological writings, and especially that of the Syrian Michel Aflaq, one of the founders of the Baath Party. But Aflaq was a Christian Arab, and his pan-Arab nationalism, though violent, racist and extreme, was also secular and modernizing. He believed religion, whether Islamic or Christian, had no place in Arab politics.

    In both Iraq and Syria, the overall tone of Baathism remained secular. In this, the Baath were following the original Italian Fascist model. The Fascists had their roots in bitterly anticlerical Italian radical nationalism, Mussolini himself having been a Socialist leader until the First World War. When in power, like Saddam Hussein’s Baath in the 1990s, the Italian Fascists made pragmatic deals with religion in the form of the Catholic Church; but in Italy and Germany, Fascism was never in any sense influenced by or close to the Christian religion. This does not, of course, make the Baathists or the Fascists more likable. It does make them very different from the forces of political religion.

    Like their Fascist predecessors, on the one hand, the Baath ideologues have regarded religious allegiances and beliefs as backward, superstitious obstacles to modernization and development. On the other, they have seen them as fomenters of sectarian discord in what should be the united Arab nation. This ideological stance underlies the ferocious persecution in the past of the Islamists in Baathist Syria and Iraq, and the bitter hatred between the Baath and the fundamentalists. Of course, both the Baath and the fundamentalists have been hostile to the West and Israel, but for largely different reasons. In the case of the Baath, this reflects first and foremost secular pan-Arab nationalism. Islamist radicals for their part often draw strength from local ethnic and national resentments, whether Kashmiri, Chechen, Pashtun, Palestinian or Sunni Iraq Arab; but their central allegiance is always to the idea of the undivided umma, or transnational community of all (or, for Al Qaeda, right-thinking Sunni) Muslims.”

    http://www.thenation.com/doc/20041025/lieven/2

    Reply

    Turgai Sangar Reply:

    “Hizb-ut-Tahrir al Islami thoroughly criticizes the experience and objectives of former Egyptian President Gamal Abdel-Nasser and completely rejects the experience of the Baath Party. It believes the members of the al Saud family of Saudi Arabia are “historically British agents” and that they have become American agents ever since the mid-fifties.”

    http://www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16391

    Reply

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.