Egypt is a signal to Central Asia
Cross-regional and Blogosphere, Politics and Society3 Comments
Editor’s note: Central Asians respond to the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt. Here, new blogger Ustrushan gives his view on the spread of democracy in the developing world and the ramifications he believes this shall have upon Central Asia.
As people’s understanding of the power and benefits of true democracy grows around the world, they stop respecting any president or ruler who wishes to remain in power for 20, 30 years or even all their lifetime, no matter how good his/her intentions may be. The institution of the presidency or, in general, leadership of a country, in modern times requires that one person can only be elected maximum of 2 terms of 4-5 years each. This is quite enough time for anyone to propose and try to implement his vision for creating better life for his/her nation. It is also physically challenging even for the smartest and most capable person to maintain best potential for public service more than 8-10 years.
Therefore, it should be clear that “shah” or “kingdom” regimes are no longer acceptable and presidency for anybody should only be temporary in order to allow changes and constant flow of the best people into and out of the government. That is the only way to ensure continuous development of any nation towards democracy, prosperity, and peace. Obviously, though, Central Asian rulers who are not considering this worldwide process seriously will experience its harsh affects on themselves sooner or later. Time is up already for presidents Rahmon, Karimov, and Nazarbaev — Egypt is the hint that they’ll probably fail to take!




[...] поста Ustrushan (ENG) От Редакции: Жители Центральной Азии реагируют на [...]
Yes, I think you’re right in thinking that in the long-run they will fail to take the lesson from the Egyptian experience. Actually the idea of masses removing their rulers is a very ancient one but that happening in so-called East or Muslim world is something very fresh.
We should be more carefully thinking about post-Karimov-Nazarbayev-Rahmon period which does not automatically bring happiness to CA societies. There is much work to be done there.
But best rulers are replacable rulers.
Reply
Turgai Reply:
February 16th, 2011 at 5:22 pm
@perman, Yes, fear and cynical apathy, which were prevalent in Tunsia and Misir too until recently, will not last. At one time there is a breaking point.
Reply