Kazakhstan

Kyrgyzstan

Tajikistan

Turkmenistan

Uzbekistan

Home » Media and Internet, Turkmenistan

The stars our destination: cyberdissent and the future of Turkmenistan

Written by on Wednesday, 28 October 2009
Media and Internet, Turkmenistan
6 Comments
Image from the 2009 edition of "The Stars My Destination", a classic American science fiction novel by Alfred Bester.

Image from the 2009 edition of "The Stars My Destination", a classic American science fiction novel by Alfred Bester about the impact of technology upon human freedom. Turkmenistan's planned satellite launch may one day be seen as symbolic, signifying the moment the country embarked upon a cyberspace odyssey.

Editor’s note: For the last two months neweurasia’s Annasoltan has been tracking the development of the “Turkmenet”, the small but growing online community in the Turkmen language.  Mystery surrounds the motivations of Turkmenistan’s government: why are the authorities so aggressively intent on expanding the internet yet also so untypically relaxed about digital dissent?

It’s a philosophical riddle as old as when humanity first learned to harness the power of fire: Will technology bring freedom or slavery?  Lately, observers of Turkmenistan find themselves asking this very question about the Internet.

Turkmenistan has one of the world’s lowest rates of Internet penetration: According to Internetworldstats.com, a website that measures global Internet access, a meager 1.4 percent of Turkmenistan’s population is wired, putting the country in 216th place out of 226.

However, two years ago, Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov, recently ascended to the Turkmen presidency, vowed to expand the Internet in his nation. Speaking at Columbia University in September 2007, he remarked, “Let me tell you frankly that the atmosphere today in Turkmenistan is just incredible. Our children feel such a strong and intense yearning for knowledge that we just can’t fail and let them down.”

At the time, neweurasia‘s pseudonymous blogger Conquistador noted that the speech was accompanied by a presentation showing young students typing on new laptops. In light of the paranoia that marked the previous regime of Saparmurat Niyazov – during which Internet access was sequestered to a tiny elite – the images were a bold statement.

“Will any of this emerge?” Conquistador asked. “That remains to be seen.” Yet, remarkably, it seems that the Berdymukhammedov regime is actually intent on keeping its word.

In September Turkmenistan hosted an IT-themed exhibition called Turkmentel 2009 and a scientific conference. Berdymukhammedov personally addressed the audience, saying, “We are doing our best so that every citizen of Turkmenistan has access to the Internet and modern communication technologies.”

Subsequently, the government declared its intention to launch Turkmenistan’s first ever communications satellite.

Senior students of Balkanabat Professional School learn about Web 2.0 technologies at the IATP center in Balkanabat, Turkmenistan.  Image courtesy of IATP Eurasia on Flickr.

Senior students of Balkanabat Professional School learn about Web 2.0 technologies at the IATP center in Balkanabat, Turkmenistan. Image courtesy of IATP Eurasia on Flickr.

BIRTH OF THE TURKMENET

neweurasia‘s Annasoltan, has been monitoring the rise of what she calls the “Turkmenet” – the Turkmen-language online community. Although minuscule, it is energetic and growing rapidly.

The Turkmenet’s appearance has already seen the rise of diverse phenomena, ranging from the dissemination of political hip hop songs in the Turkmen language to Islamic revivalism on Facebook.

A salient moment came on 12 September, when riots erupted between Turkmen and Chinese workers for a Chinese energy company in the Samandepe region of eastern Turkmenistan. According to RFE/RL, the Turkmen workers had complained of poor working conditions and wage discrimination.

“Although, as usual with such situations, the incident was completely unmentioned by the tightly-controlled Turkmen media, news of it still reached the Turkmenet,” Annasoltan reported. “[It] quickly sparked a vibrant and very public discussion.

“The riot has been particularly disappointing to those already embittered by the government’s constant refrain that it is defending the interests of the Turkmen population. Many are interpreting the incident as proof that the Turkmen government has sided with foreigners – in this case the Chinese – over its own citizens. One user even compares the Turkmen to the Uighurs of China.”

Remarkably, the Turkmen government did nothing to stop the criticism. In fact, the opposite happened: Ashgabad.ru, a very active online forum where residents of the Turkmen capital comment about their city which was mysteriously shut down in June, was abruptly reactivated.

Several of the forum’s topics are openly critical of the government; one topic even asks expatriated Turkmen, “Do you ever want to return?” [Click here and here to see screen captures of the controversial topic in Russian and English, respectively.  Observe the thread entitled, "I hate Turkmenistan."]

“Something is brewing online,” Annasoltan observes.

THE MOTIVATION?

Reacting to the satellite announcement, Annasoltan writes, “Indeed, aside from boosting national pride and invoking trust in the country’s development, [the satellite launch] does in reality mean good news for the country’s internet and mobile phone users.   Of course, a satellite isn’t exactly what Niyazov had in mind when he vowed to put Turkmens into space during the 21st Century.”  This raises an important question: if not the stars, what is Berdimuhammedov’s destination?

We should first consider the possibility that the government is actually being sincere. It may envision a steady and controlled increase in Internet access as necessary for the country’s development. Certainly, this interpretation seems consistent with what the government itself has said, including a 20 September statement that connected the planned satellite launch with catching up with the “critical role that telecommunication systems [have] played in the modern world.

There has obviously been no mention of the Internet’s potential use for dissent. Yet, a certain tolerance for criticism would also be consistent with a policy geared toward long-term development.

However, given the government’s consistently grievous track record on human rights and democracy, the idea that the authorities may actually envision a free and unfettered Internet as useful to the country’s development strains credulity.

Another possibility, along the same lines, is that the government is naïve, incompetent, disorganized, or some combination of the three. The authorities may simply not yet understand the anarchic effect of the perceived anonymity that comes with the internet – a social phenomenon known all too well in the wired West. Similarly, the government’s online expansion may be outpacing its own ability to police the new cybernetic spaces its decisions are creating.

Yet, the mental image of the government somehow being caught off guard by the Internet, much less its own policies, seems highly unlikely. In fact, previously the authorities have demonstrated a very high aptitude in regulating the Internet.

A more frightening possibility, then, is that the authorities actually want digital dissent. They may be confident in their policing abilities to the extent that they don’t feel a need to obsessively squash online dissent because they see it is as limited to an observable few and easily stoppable.

Conversely, the authorities may find digitalized dissent useful to vent discontent. Indeed, they may be seeking to lure out malcontents in order to catalog them for future elimination. It’s an Orwellian proposition, yes, but Turkmenistan wouldn’t be the first totalitarian regime to try it.

As always with this shadowy government, it is impossible to know its motivations. But one fact is clear: Turkmenistan has embarked upon a journey that could have major consequences for its future political and cultural life.

The satellite launch may one day be seen as symbolic by future Turkmens as the moment when their country embarked upon a unique cyberspace odyssey.  The year 2009 for them could be for them in reality what 2001 is only metaphorically for Westerners.

That’s a pretty bold prophecy to make.  However, recent events in Iran have shown that the Internet, once unleashed, is infectious and resilient. It carves out new and ever-shifting spaces of personal freedom too slippery for state control. It is within these spaces that dissatisfaction finds its voice. Dissidents, newly cyberized, discover that they are not alone and that there is strength in numbers, even binary ones.

Editor’s note (2): This post is an expanded and hyperlinked version of an editorial by neweurasia’s Managing Editor for English, Chris Schwartz, originally published with our affiliate Transitions Online (TOL) under the title “A Pandora’s Box”.

Bookmark and Share

6 Comments »

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.