Kazakhstan

Kyrgyzstan

Tajikistan

Turkmenistan

Uzbekistan

Home » Kyrgyzstan, Politics and Society

Terror in, Terror out

Written by on Thursday, 13 August 2009
Kyrgyzstan, Politics and Society
3 Comments

According to a recent interview with newly re-elected President Bakiev, Russia is interested in building another military installation in Kyrgyzstan.  Not a base, per se, but a training center to help combat regional terrorism.  Central Asia is the northern neighbor of Afghanistan and its long history of Islamic fundamentalism-fueled extremism.

It is worth noting that Russia’s ambivalence towards United States military build-up in Afghanistan might be based in a fear of a Central Asian domino effect.  If some force, external or domestic, united Central Asia’s Muslim populations, it would be possible for Russia’s own growing Muslim minority to act in sympathy with their southern brethren.

Most interesting is the opinion stated by Bakiev:

“The Afghanistan situation is affecting not only Kyrgyzstan but Central Asia as a whole and, frankly, the entire world,” he said. “People have come here to carry out acts of terror.”

While the Global War on Terror might have temporarily solidified a very difuse mixture of cultures and countries, this statement makes it clear that the perspectives are still very different.  The average American or Western opinion would seem to be the opposite of Bakiev’s.  In other words, it is not that Afghanistan and Central Asia are under attack by terrorists, but that terrorists from Afghanistan and Central Asia have taken their native troubles abroad with bombings in Europe and the horrible events of September 11th, 2001.

Medvedev and others in Russia have yet to respond or comment on Bakiev’s public mention of their plans for military buildup in Kyrgyzstan.  Bakiev is between a rock and a hard place, and will never totally enter one side’s sphere of influence, but continue to play the two off each other.  For those same reasons, any deals made with the United States are quickly reported in Russian media.  Kyrgyzstan stays afloat by keeping in the relative good graces of one or both of the world powers.

Bookmark and Share

3 Comments »

  • Schwartz says:

    Time for the really harsh Devil’s Advocate: not to digress too far off your basic point, but couldn’t the same be said for the region as a whole? With the possible exception of Kazakhstan, none of ‘Stans are viable without the critical influence of a major power to inject economic, if not political, life into them.

    (Wow. That may have been my meanest and most uneducated blog comment yet.)

    Reply

  • Timur says:

    I agree 100%. But the article that was my jumping off point was from Bakiev, and I think that Kyrgyzstan [along with Tajikistan] is the least self-sufficient and independent from other powers.

    Reply

  • Anders says:

    It’s very intersteing reading these news at Neweurasia.net

    I hope Kyrgyzstan keep upp the good work improving the nation with modern infrastructure, technology and health care.
    It’s hard work so I hope the Kyrgysztan nation protects their hard working citizens from corruption and illegal threats domestic as well as foreign otherwise the nation are doomed.

    Reply

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.