A nation with strong economic growth and a majority Muslim population free of religious extremism. One that borders two major powers as well as nations with potentially radical religious movements. One with oil, and great possibility for much more, in a world economy handcuffed over black gold.

This island of stability is Kazakhstan. At least that is a way to justify not highlighting issues such as freedom of the press.

Notice the limited criticism of Kazakhstan, even from Western nations that suppose to put human rights at the top of their foreign policy agendas. Each has its reasons:

Russia:
In order to hold on to its waning influence in the ex-USSR and to fight off criticism of its own human rights record they are best to remain quiet. Moscow is still important in the eyes most Kazakhstanies, a position they do not want to loose.

China:
Unlike Russia, Kazakhstan has no affinity for China. Yet oil talks – China is in serious need and Kazakhstan is happy to export. Human rights are not an issue in Chinese foreign policy.

USA and by extension most Western governments:
While the USA is the most vocal on the issue of oil, due in large part to its superpower status, it is only one of many governments fearful of poor relations with a growing oil power. All look to diversify from crude powers such as Saudi Arabia and Russia.

CIS nations:
Take Georgia for example. They need an alternative source of oil in order to reduce dependency on Russia. President Saakashvili was front and centre at the re-inauguration of Nazarbayev in January. While Central Asia neighbours, with the possible exception of Kyrgyzstan, have no great human rights agenda.

In this context where should Kazakhstan fit in the foreign policies of Western nations?